Card Sort: economic markers
- Gribanov was limited by his medium: he was producing playing cards, not books.
- There is an implicit bias in the cards toward the production of goods for market. Household and other domestic activities are glaringly absent.
- The cards seesaw between generality and specificity. Sometimes we are left wondering what sorts of factories are present in a province; sometimes we descend into the micro level of horse glue rendering or the production of artificial mineral water. (I am not making those up.)
- Economic activity in the Russian Empire has a curious relationship with social status: it was possibly to wield power without possessing wealth, and wealth could not always be converted into power. That said, it is very much worth thinking about the gulf between the sorts of people who controlled economic resources and those whose labor made them productive.
Here is our visualization tool:
_Russian_style_1911_original.jpg){kind=link}
