Students in Service and Leadership at Harvard

Blueprint of Action

Research Question
What support structures exist within Army ROTC programs to support first-generation cadets, and how can these existing support structures be improved?

Methods
Likert Scale & Long Answer Questions

Questions
Results

How would you describe the culture of ROTC?
Did you ever feel “behind” at any point in ROTC? What helped to alleviate that feeling?
[For MS4s. Skip if you aren't an MS4.] - How prepared did you feel for Cadet Summer Training? What about ROTC positively contributed to your experience at CST? What could have been done better?
Is there anything about ROTC you would change, either from your experience your first year or now, in order to better support first-generation cadets?
Recommendations
A few things jump out at me as I read through the results of this survey. One, being first-generation military is a salient part of these cadets' identity (but they've also developed different ways to address that identity through their time in ROTC). The idea of mentorship is also a repeated point, whether it be cadet-to-cadet or cadre-to-cadet. Finally, the point of diversity through representation also comes up, with cadets saying that exposure to more service members helped them to feel more secure.

With this, I propose the following recommendations:
  1. Build in formal mentorship into the program. Each cadet will be paired with another cadet in the battalion (preferably with someone in a different year as them). These cadet pairs will be responsible for doing physical training together (outside of the campus session) as well as keeping each other accountable for the work that needs to be done in their military science classes. Cadets can also ask each other for help here if they don't feel comfortable reaching out to their chain of command.
  2. Ensure that when the chain of command changes that as many cadets as possible get some sort of leadership position; This could also mean prioritizing cadets who haven't had a leadership position yet to take one on. Time in a leadership position will allow cadets to learn through experience.
  3. Build a directory of all active duty and reserve officers and make this information accessible to cadets. We have many officers come in for special events around once a semester, and these officers are eager to mentor cadets. Making their information accessible (with their consent) allows cadets to be able to connect with someone who might align with their career interests, first-generation identity, race/ethnicity, gender, etc.
  4. Do battalion-wide social events. A lot of the time, cadets can't be themselves because they must be professional in the training environment. Having social events will allow cadets to let their guard down and connect on a more human level.
  5. Institute formal office hours with cadre. While cadets are free to reach out to cadre on their own accord and schedule time to talk, not everyone might realize that's an option. Having formal office hours might encourage more cadets to reach out for help.
I opened these recommendations up to apply to every cadet and not just those who are first-generation because while the concerns highlighted by the cadets in my survey are exacerbated by being first-generation, I imagine that every cadet to some degree shares these sentiments and concerns. Furthermore, these recommendations all call for a shift in culture, which is hard to do in general, let alone in the military. By framing these recommendations as things that will benefit everyone and not just a select group of individuals, there will be more incentive to accept them. Furthermore, these recommendations build on structures that already exist implicitly in the program; Institutionalizing them will allow for the creation of institutional memory and ensure that these structures last as long as possible.

This page references: